July 28, 2003 Agenda
July 28, 2003 Minutes

Town of Emerald Isle
Planning Board Meeting
Monday, July 28, 2003
7:00 PM at Town Hall

  1. Call to Order
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 23, 2003
  4. Conduct election for Vice-Chair of the Planning Board
  5. Report from the Planning Director
    • Town Board Meeting, July 8, 2003
    1. Dunes and Preservation Ordinance
    2. Amendment to Section 19-8(b)
    3. Flood Damage Ordinance, Section 19-251 thru 330
    • Land Use Steering Committee Update, July 8, 2003
    • Building Inspection Report, June 2003
    • Meetings to Note
    1. Town Board of Commissioners, August 12, 2003
    2. LUP Steering Committee, August 13, 2003
    3. Planning Board, August 25, 2003
  6. Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code to allow for the establishment of businesses specializing in therapeutic message and acupuncture.
  7. Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code, Dunes and Vegetation Ordinance, in order to address issues related to septic systems.
  8. Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code in order to address issues related to the outside display of goods and merchandise in commercial districts.
  9. Development of Policies and Procedures in order to govern the activities of the Planning Board.
  10. Comments
  11. Adjourn

Town of Emerald Isle
Planning Board Minutes
Monday, July 28, 2003

The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Chairman Erikson. Members present were:

James Craig, Ed Dowling, Frank Erwin, Pam Minnick, Pat Patteson and Joe Quigley. Also attending were Kevin Reed, Planning and Inspections Director; and Carol Angus, Secretary.

3. The minutes of the regular Meeting of June 23, 2003 were approved as written.

4. Chairman Erikson then asked for nominations for Vice-chairman.  Ed Dowling nominated Pam Minnick; however, she declined and nominated Pat Patteson.  Mr. Patteson was unanimously voted as Vice-chairman.

5. Kevin Reed, Planning and Inspections Director, gave the members an update on the findings and discussion at the Town Board of Commissioners meeting Tuesday, July 8, 2003.  He advised of the adoption of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance that had been recommended at the June Planning Board Meeting.  Mr. Reed advised that the Land Use Plan survey would be mailed out in August to assist the Steering committee in their future consideration.

Chairman Erikson then introduced Mr. Joseph Quigley, the newly appointed Planning Board member that filled the vacancy created with the resignation of Art Daniel. Mr. Quigley said he has lived in Emerald Isle since 1987 and gave a brief summary of his background and hoped to be an asset to the Planning Board.

Chairman Erikson, referring to June minutes, then asked for an update on the committee that was appointed to review the Stormwater Ordinance as it relates to stormwater plans for subdivisions that require no land disturbance and only lot line delineations.  Frank Erwin advised that he, Jim Craig, and Mike Harvey, Planning Consultant, had talked with town staff on this issue. They are planning to contact engineers from other municipalities.  Mr. Reed will assist the committee in continuing their review of this issue.

Further, from the June minutes, Ms. Erikson asked for the status of the Coastal Area Management Agency (CAMA) representative that has possibly been scheduled for the July meeting.  Ms. Angus advised that a CAMA official was not able to attend tonight’s meeting and will attempt to have some representation at the August 25 meeting.

Mr. Dowling then referred to a topic that he had brought before the board previously. He asked why the street standards were not being administered in regard to the 3:1 slope required.  Mr. Dowling is particularly concerned about the sheeting of stormwater from the Citgo station on the slope entering an leaving the parking lot and he asked that a visit be made to the site to see if the town might implement some sort of ditching or stormwater catch basin for the intersection of Coast Guard Road (north end) and Emerald Dr (Hwy 58).  Mr. Reed said he will look into this with Artie Dunn, Public Works Director.

Mr. Jane DeLoretto, 205 Marsh Wren, Lands End, then registered some concerns about the flooding in Lands End regarding pumping of stormwater. She wants to see some help prior to a disaster to pump prior to flooding to help with retention once a storm should arrive.  She agreed that the town has helped out considerably in the past.  Mr. Reed advised the board that this concern will be brought before the new town engineer and Mr. Artie Dunn, Public Works Director.

Mr. Patteson said he has looked at the area Mr. Dowling mentioned and finds that the lot is running to the retention area; but the drain at the bottom of the slope seems like a good idea.

Mr. Dowling then referred to several portions of the ordinance that needed looked at for driveways, as follows: 18-43 (2)h New Subdivision I.e. driveway for condominiums 14’, one
way, 24’ two way 19-101 (13) single family & duplex are limited to 2 driveways on ROW
not to exceed 16’ each. Recommend: from 12’ to 16’. Question what
will the impact of 35% natural area have on this figure?


19-121 (a) (5) Width & length of residential driveway- not less than 10’
if part is used as a parking area; it shall be of sufficient length (??????)
to keep cars off ROW. Recommend: 10’.

Mr. Dowling had further drawings to illustrate his findings.

6. Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code to allow for the establishment of businesses specializing in therapeutic massage and acupuncture.

Mr. Reed advised the Board the current Massage Parlor ordinance is inconsistent with North Carolina law and feels the ordinance should be repealed in it’s entirety and list massage therapists and acupuncturists in the permitted use table (Sec. 19-82) with doctors, dentists, nurses, podiatrists, etc., as licensed health care professionals.   He then asked Ms. Bright Walker, a prospective massage therapist and acupuncturist, to address the Board about this issue.

Ms. Walker, 5415 Cedar Tree Lane, gave the board some background on the licensing, education, certifications required, and continued monitoring of an accredited therapist.  She does not want to be included with a massage parlor, they are for adult entertainment, and her profession does not deal with this type clientele. The ordinance that Emerald Isle now has in effect was made ineffectual 5 years ago when Governor  Hunt signed the present North Carolina law into effect.  Ms. Walker answered some questions from the Board regarding licensing.

There was some discussion as to whether the massage and acupuncture therapists would be able to operate from their homes and an incidental home occupation.   Ms. Walker said that although she intends to operate from an office in the commercial district, she would not want to see such practice not be permitted from one’s home; especially if it were through a separate entrance and did not violate any other regulation within the town.

Motion was made by Frank Erwin to recommend to the Town board to repeal the current ordinance in it’s entirety and list massage therapists and acupuncture with medical professionals as Mr. Reed has recommended; second by Pam Minnick with unanimous approval in favor of the motion.

7.  Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code, Dunes and Vegetation, in order to address issues related to septic systems.  

Mr. Patteson made a motion to recommend that a representative from the Carteret County Health Department meet with the board to advise the requirements of their department.  After the board is aware of what regulations are necessary it would be more likely to make viable recommendations to the town board for their approval.

Mr. Reed said he will try to have someone to represent the Carteret County Health Department at the August meeting.

8.  Possible amendments to Section 19 of the Town Code in order to address issues related to the outside display of goods and merchandise in commercial districts.

Mr. Reed said he felt that the portion of the ordinance that referred to outside display on public sidewalks did not pertain to these issues, because by his definition, the areas concerned are not public sidewalks but private property.  He would have authority if the racks were on town or state right-of-way.

Ms. Jane DeLoretto, 205 Marsh Wren Ct., addressed the board of the conditions at Islmorada, at Veranda Square, with the outside display of merchandise on numerous clothing racks.  She said it looks like a flea market or bargain basement.  The owner at Islmorada had been advised that racks could be placed 5’ on each side of the door; however, these racks run the entire length and width of the store and in some places doubled.  She feels appearance is important and some method of control should be implemented.

There was a considerable amount of discussion regarding this request with the repercussions of such an ordinance. The ACE Hardware with trashcans, picnic tables, the watering figurines, lawn mowers, etc.; Food Lion with Christmas trees, flowers, seasonal items; the individual stores with their sale items, water toys, flags.  Should an ordinance be restrictive enough to prohibit ice machines, water machines, vending machines, newspaper, real estate magazines, etc?  There will be quite a wide perspective necessary for the writing of such an ordinance.

Mark Brennesholtz, 9322 Ocean Drive, said the Hwy 58 committee had wanted to avoid ‘tackiness’. He does not feel sidewalks are the issue, but pride and attractiveness. He did agree that such an ordinance would not be east to formulate or enforce.

Mr. Reed said such an ordinance would be very difficult to enforce, if not impossible.

Ms. Doje Marks spoke in favor of regulating such display.

Mr. Craig asked Mr. Reed if he might go to other towns for help to which Mr. Reed agreed.

Chairman Erikson said she will be happy to assist Mr. Reed in this issue.

9.  Development of Policies and Procedures in order to govern the activities of the Planning Board.   Chairman Erikson and Kevin Reed with work on a final draft of policies and procedures for the Planning Board and present it to the board in the near future.

10.  Comments:

Commissioner Marks commented on the issue of the Emerald Plantation Sewage treatment system.  It is far in arrears is payment of fines and bringing the plant into compliance with the Health Department. Might a possible bond be initiated to make the necessary repairs?

Mark Brennesholtz said this had been a Land Use Plan steering committee discussion. Tax zones had been created for beach renourishment, could such tax zones not be created for these repairs.  Funds could be held in escrow to determine costs and continuing function of the system.

Bill Reist, Woodcliff Drive, asked that Mr. Reed find out how Nags Head handled this issue.

Mr. Patteson, who lives in Emerald Plantation, said this system has been mismanaged for the 13 years he has lived there and he does not feel this is something that should burden the town.

Mr. Dowling then asked to read a point of view he had on another issue that had been discussed at a previous Planning Board meeting regarding the length of piers into Bogue Sound. 

The following is a verbatim transcript of Mr. Dowling’s comments:

“Land Use Plan: The town sound front, and the Outstanding
Resources Waters (ORW) Bogue Sound provide the high quality RECREATIONAL,
and AESTHETIC values to residents and visitors. They are the UNDERPINNINGS
for the LOCAL ECON. The quality of these resources is the result of LONG
TERM EFFORTS by the Town and property.


Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC): The property ESTURARINE SHORE
LINE is PUBLIC TRUST and contiguous to waters classified as ORW. The AEC,
with its vegetated salt marsh fields , extends 575’ landwards from normal
high water level or normal water level. It is within the designated 300
acres of Coastal wetlands located north of Coast Guard Rd. Highest
developmental priorities and standards must be assigned so as to continue
to enforce conservation of AEC. EI PLANNING JURISDICTION includes ORW,
SHORELINE, WETLANDS, as shown on map 7A item 49.. Furthermore, the fixed
pier under consideration is classified as a CONSERVATION area Pg 111-2 and
on the map pg 111-4.

Public Trust Waters: are described 15A NCAC7H.0206, and .0207 A key
MANAGEMNET PRINCIPLE for public trust waters is to maintain the
ACCESSIBILITY and USE for the GOOD of the public. OPEN , UNRESTRICTED,
FREE PASSAGE, with out interfering with NAVIGATION, or CITIZENS RIGHTS to
USE PUBLIC WATERS in small boats, canoes, etc. is a requirement. The
request for a 400’ pier extended, or until 4’ water depth is reached
creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship on the public and
there is good reason to disapprove the request.

16-2(9) States The ECOMOMY of the Town of EI, as well as the WELFARE
of its citizens, is dependent upon the preservation of pristine beaches,
clean NAVIGATIONAL waterways, abundant fishing and shell fishing resources
and healthy ECOSYSTEMS that attract visitors to the Town.  AESTHETICS
will be compromised. The 400+ pier will not promote productive and
enjoyable HARMONY between human activities and nature. There is good reason
to disapprove the request based on the fact that the length of the pier will
not benefit the PUBLIC. It is not AESTHETIC pleasing or in HARMONY w/
nature.

16-4 Adverse impact is significant i.e. The modification, alteration of
a feature or characteristic of EI community waters or wetlands, including
their quality, quantity, hydrodynamics, surface areas, species composition,
living resources, AESTHETICS, or usefulness for HUMAN USES which is or may
be potential , or HARMFUL, or INJURIOUS to human or, the WELFARE,
SAFETY, or property to biological productivity, diversity, or stability, or which
UNRESONABILITY INTERFERENCE with the enjoyment of life or property,.
including outdoor RECREATION. This includes secondary and cumulative as
well as direct impacts, on the site.



Chapter 6, Art 81-100, pg 368-9 Sect. C specifies that pier  max. length shall be 100 from the high water mark. The project is inconsistent with EI ordinance. The merits for the STANDARAS were debatedin 1999, and eventually approved on Nov 2000, by BC. Clearly to allow the extension from 100’ to 400’+ of the pier length is not in keeping
with either the precedent, intent, or spirit of the ordinance.


By the vary nature of the INVERTED design standard
(400’ extention, or 4’ depth of water) for the fixed pier with and boat lifts impose a potential problems for ADJACENT neighbor. This pier will be abeam of any FLOOD SURGE, rising water, storm wind, or hurricane. Weather conditions may be the primary cause or the end product resulting in a calamity from the collapsing structure and dun age. This scenario constitutes a NUSIANCE on PUBLIC TRUST land/ORW as defined in Sect 9-21 pg 528 ©. Safety and welfare of EI citizens are of major concern. Property in this Flood Hazard area Category 1,2,3 SURGE area Pg 1-58 Map 5 1996 Land Use Plan.. Its imperative that this enclosure be contained in the 2004 Land Use Plan.
The CONTOUR INTERVAL from the edge of the public trust shoreline and
estuarine waters is at a constant grade level of approximately 36. This constant, fixed , natural contour line extends out into the sound about 200’ before deep water becomes a reality. The proposed length of the pier meeting the STANDARD for rendering access to deeper water at the rate of at least (1) one foot at each 100’ increment of pier length longer than 200’ has not been met, or proven to be a fact. Exact standard measurements, to determine the piers total length (made from the waters forward edge of the shoreline which borders the sound.) appear to be lacking.  Personal Reconn. in a boat verified this FACT.

Three small productive OYSTER islands/reefs are part of the ecosystem under
consideration. A management objective and BMP for the ESTUARINE system
must be considered to safeguard, conserve and perpetuate these biological,
aesthetic, and econ. resource. Questions - What will be the impact and
total effect on the natural salinity levels on site and will sediment in
time kill the bi-valves.

 

All fixed piers MUST be required to be on a PIER LINE that follows the
natural contour line .THE Pier line must not be longer than the pier head
line established by the adjacent piers i.e. Bogue Sound Subdivision and
the pier located at ,or about 1010 Coast Guard Rd. This pier line exists fm.
The Point to the bridge. The proposed alignment of this pier will thrust it
well beyond the pier head line of these two adjacent neighbors. A new
precedent will be set that allows more piers to be built out extending
past the said EI pier line?

Enforcement of the current Codes /rules will not result in loss of property
value or cause unnecessary hard ship on property owners.
Recommend that existing pier ordinance and standards not be unraveled:


1.That EI continue to align all piers along one pier head line based upon
the set location of exiting fixed piers.
2. That all piers be built in a straight line between two set/fixed points.
3. That maximum length of piers shall be one hundred feet from the high
water mark. Major Coastal Management Agency permits shall be reviewed in
order for a applicant to gain access over vegetated, salt grass and to
determine if the proposed length of the pier must be extended to meet a
standard for rendering access to water at the minimum rate of one foot at
each 100’ increment of the total pier length. 4. At the edge of the
public trust estuarine shoreline and after water access is gained a pier,
dock, deck platform or single story boat house shall be built
5. Data shall be included to support the accuracy of the measurement of
one foot at each 100’ increment and pier head line. The seal of approval
by a surveyor licensed to practice in the NC is encouraged.
6. The length of the pier and final measurement will terminate at the
forward edge of the vegetated salt grass bed that borders waters edge.
 may be attached they shall not exceed 200 SF.
7. Piers shall be designed to provide docking space for no more than 2
boats lifts. Area enclosed by boat lifts shall not exceed 400 SF.
8. Platforms and decks shall have a width of no more than of any
dimension extending over coastal salt grass marshes
9. Piers, docks, decks, platforms and boat houses shall be single story.
They may be roofed but shall not allow second story use. This rule is
violated in only one incident. (EI should rectify this situation.
10. Setback shall not exceed 15’ between adjacent property lines.)
11. The rule allowing 4’ depth of water is totally with out merit and
should be considered.

12. All property owners have a right to the use and accesses to waters in
the sound.


RECOMMEND AFTER DISCUSSION THAT THIS MATTER BE TABLED AND THAT NO PERMIT BE ISSUED UNTIL CAMA MAKES ITS PRESENTATION. THE CURRENT SECTION IN ORDINACE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BUT AN APPT PB COMMITTEE.”

Motion was made to adjourn by Pat Patteson, second by Jim Craig with unanimous approval in favor of the motion.

8:50 PM

Respectfully submitted by:

Carol Angus, Secretary
Town of Emerald Isle
Planning Board