|
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE EMERALD ISLE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, JULY 29, 2002 – 8:30 A.M. – TOWN HALL
The Emerald Isle Board of Commissioners held a Special Meeting beginning
at 8:30 A.M. at the Emerald Isle Town Hall for the purpose of discussion and
consideration of adoption of the fiscal year 2002-2003 Budget.
Mayor Schools called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. Board Members present were Mayor Art Schools, Commissioners
McElraft, Farmer, Marks, Messer and Eckhardt.
Staff members present were Town Manager Frank Rush, Asst. Town
Manager/Finance Officer Georgia Overman and Town Clerk Carolyn Custy.
Mr. Rush, Town Manager presented the Board with two scenarios on the FY
2002-2003 budget. The first one was
with a tax rate of 18.5 cents tax rate. He
said there were no surprises on the recommendation.
He did point out that on the Revenue side, there is an item of
appropriation of the old storm water fund in the amount of $38,000 and this is a
little less that what has been discussed in previous meetings.
There have been a few more expenses from that fund and the balance left
at this time is now $38,000.
A Police Grant has been decreased by $1,025 on the revenue side where too
much revenue was budgeted. On the
expenditure side, it has been increased by $3,750. This is the Governor’s Highway Safety Grant Program.
Everything else is consistent with what has been discussed in previous
workshop meetings.
Mr. Rush informed the board that the NC House has approved a proposal
that was made on the ½ cent sales tax to be effective January 1st.
One more vote will be taken on it and then it will go to the Senate where
it is likely to be rejected. Mr.
Rush thinks the town will get some form of sales tax next fiscal year but he
does not know how it will turn out with the January 1 effective date.
He recommended that the board consider adopting a budget today.
He does not think we will know the outcome of the sales tax within the
next week or two.
Mr. Rush presented another proposal that is 18 cents General Fund Tax
Rate. This proposal takes in the
new house sales tax proposal. Essentially
if the board chose to accept this tax rate and the sales tax did not come
through, the town would have to identify $85,000 of additional cuts midway
through the year or appropriate this amount from Fund Balance.
Mr. Rush reiterated he thinks there will be some sales tax received this
year but doesn’t know how much and when.
Commissioner
McElraft made a motion to accept Public Comment and the board voted unanimously,
5-0.
Mr. John Wootten, 103 Eagles Nest, urged the board not to increase the
tax rate for this year. At the
workshop that was held in June, the Town Manager did give an alternative that
would retain the current 17.5 cents tax rate plus the 3 cents for beach
renourishment. Mr. Wootten went
over what has happened up to this point. There
is 3 cents for beach nourishment and part of that package was the “sales tax
rebate” that was going to be at least 3 cents if not 4 cents.
Even with the numbers that Town Manager was working with, those numbers
are a reality but what has happened to the 4 cents tax rebate.
If you take a look at it, 2 cents has gone to fund EMS, which is
recognized, as something the town would do.
The remainder of that fund has been delayed and per the Town Managers
calculations, it will not come into full effect until next year.
Next year the revenues will exceed this years revenues by between $300,00
and $400,000 as best as can be determined.
Next question is what are you going to do when your revenues next year
are going to be higher than this year? Mr.
Wootten said you do some actions to stretch out and match the expenditures of
this year with the revenue strength. Go
conservative this year and match the revenues, avoid a tax increase and handle
the problems in the future years. Mr.
Wootten said one way to do that is to stretch out the debt payment for the piece
of property down on Coast Guard Road. That
payment was scheduled to be completed over a two-year time, somewhat an
arbitrary decision. It looked like
a good one at that time. There is
no reason in Mr. Wootten’s mind that it cannot be delayed and funded over a
four-year period of time.
Mr. Wootten calculated it would cost the town somewhere between $18,000
to $19,000 in increased interest over that period of time but trade that off by
keeping a penny’s worth of taxes in peoples pockets over a two year period of
time would roughly be $216,000. Comments
have been made about the delay of the project.
Mr. Wootten does not see that because the financing stream, the money has
flowed to buy the property, the money will have to be raised in the future to
finish the project so the payment stream is being discussed, not necessarily the
completion of the project. Comments
have been heard that everyone is faced with a tax increase, the EMS cost is
going up and it is. This town is
going to annie-up $200,000 within the budget presented to handle higher EMS
cost. Comments that tax increased
are inevitable. Mr. Wootten said
what the Town Manager gave the board was not inevitable for two years and in the
budget world and in this small community, two years is pretty close to
inevitability. Who knows what could
happen in that period of time? Mr.
Wootten suggested going with the Alternative C that was presented in June
because this is tough times at present. He
asked, “How much have you lost in the stock market”?
Mr. Wootten commented he has been through the many 5-year forecasts and
different alternatives. He is a
little concerned about an attitude. His
final point made before he got to the attitude concern, was his suggestion to
put the ½ cents sales tax that may come in December or January, if it comes,
into reserve. Put the risk taking
into building the reserve. Mr.
Wootten commented out of all of the 5-year projections, there is not one that
shows a decreased. It is almost
“If I have the money I am going to spend it”.
If the tax rate goes up to 18.5 cents this year it stays at 18.5 and
grows. Tighter controls need to be thought of.
Mr. Ronnie Watson, 9100 Coast Guard Road, commented he is not used to
coming to a budget meeting at 8:30 in the morning and he guessed that was why
there were not very many people present. He
thought that when you were spending the taxpayers money, not your money, to have
a budget meeting at 8:30 A.M. is a little out of the norm.
He thought people would have appreciated it if the meeting had been
scheduled at a later time because a lot of people were working and could not
attend. He commented he has been
told that the budget was already set by one of the town officials and it has
bothered him. He reiterated what
Mr. Wootten said and he does not want to see a tax increase because there is
already a tax increase. The County is 42 cents, a lot of Emerald Isle residents will
be paying 48 cents for the beach tax and if the town goes with 18.5 cents tax
rate for a lot of people that will be $1.08.
Some will be looking at a total tax of .63 cents.
Mr. Watson said these are tough times if you look at the State, the
Country and the town. He felt that
the representatives of this town and the Town Manager should start tightening
their belts. Mr. Watson noted that
the Town Manager comes from a different generation than he, but he is a lot more
conservative than he is or than the board is.
Mr. Watson knows times are tough. It
is not just taxes, but also insurance rates increase because we are one of the 9
Coastal Counties in North Carolina and all the other increases that the people
are having to deal with. Those in
business are having to tighten belts and he thinks it is up to the board to
tighten theirs.
Mr. Watson expressed a concern about the way money is being spent in this
town. Every time he turns around,
he reads something in the paper or comes to a meeting and hears about a grant.
There is nothing free out there. Those
funds have to be matched with taxpayer’s money and the town cannot take care
of what it already has. Mr. Watson
said he went to the Town parking lot (Western Regional Access) this morning just
to look at it. He has written the
Town Manager and the board about the way it is being maintained.
“It is a junk hole down there and every time you turn around it is a
grant for this and a grant for that. That
is our money you are spending. It
is not yours. It is ours.
The taxpayers. I think you
need to be a little more conservative. Watch
what you are spending”. Mr.
Watson said he does not want to see a tax increase because there is already an
increase. There are other things
that are costing the town more money and one of them is attorney fees. Mr. Watson implied that it is nothing against the attorney,
but that is a fact compared to what it was 2 years ago. Mr. Watson has never seen anything like it.
If a lot of people ran their businesses the way the town is run, they
would have some problems. Mr. Watson suggested the board tighten their belts.
When times get tough, you get tough with them.
You have to cut out the fat and when economic times are good, then yes,
we look at things differently then but times are not good right now.
Mr. Watson thanked the board for listening.
Commissioner
Marks made a motion to close Public Comments and the board voted unanimously
with a vote of 5-0.
Mayor Schools said many budget meetings had been held, and public comment
was welcomed at all of them. The public hearing for the budget was held in June,
and the commissioners decided delay adopting a budget until late July, in hopes
that the state would have made a decision on the 1/2 cent local option sales
tax. All of the Commissioner
and himself agreed that the date and time of today was when the meeting should
be held.
Mr. Watson interjected that they knew in June that the Interim Budget was
going to be passed and that is why there was not that much participation.
Mayor Schools said if anyone was wrong about setting the time for this
budget meeting, they all were wrong, not just certain commissioners.
Mayor Schools commented he personally is in favor of the 18.5 cents tax
rate and if the Sales Tax comes in, it should go to increase the reserve.
Everyone is in bad shape, the State, the Federal Government and the town.
If we encounter a hurricane, it would be very difficult at the current
reserve level. We need to increase our reserves.
Commissioner Marks read a statement as follows:
“In June, the board adopted an interim budget in hopes that the State
Legislature would pass a bill allowing NC Towns and cities to enact a ½ cent
sales tax starting July 1. At least
two of the items in this budget were enacted by the previous board and supported
by a majority of the present board. The
adoption of a 2-cent tax increase to pay for the purchase of land for the
Town’s Coast Guard Road storm
water project was adopted in 2001. That
2-cents amount is reflected in this year’s budget and is a continuation of the
plan to pay for the purchase of the 40+ acres plus the development of the
project over a 10-year period.
The second item in this year’s budget that was enacted by the previous
board and supported by both boards is town funding of Emerald isle EMS.
The 2001-2002 budget reflected a half year of funding in the amount of
$100,000. The 2002-2003 budget
picks up a full year of funding for a total of $185,000.
This item alone accounts for 8/10 of the 1-cent increase.
Although Emerald Isle EMS has operated in the past almost entirely on
voluntary donations, those donations came from only 40% of the property owners
and residents. That 40% underwrote
the cost for the other 60% who did not contribute.
When donations were no longer keeping up with increasing costs, it was
decided to seek town funding with a contract for services that would reflect the
actual cost of funding the ambulance service.
Every other rescue squad/EMS service in this county is funded either
through the town’s operating budget or by a rescue tax that is imposed in
addition to local town taxes. Towns
like Cedar Point and Pelletier who boast a 5 cents town tax rate do not mention
the additional fire tax of $ .07 a hundred plus an additional Rescue tax of $.05
per hundred that is added to that tax rate to provide fire and ambulance
services. That would bring their
tax rates to $ .17 cents a hundred with no provision for police service.
This years budget will see a 1-cent tax increase to maintain town
services and allow town employees a cost of living increase.
As a retiree who is on a fixed income, I receive a cost of living
increase in my Social Security income. I
am not willing to support a budget that will not provide cost of living
increases for town employees. Few
town employees can afford to live in Emerald Isle.
It would be most unfair for the town to ask its employees to forgo a cost
of living increase so that residents will not have to see a 1-cent increase in
their tax rate”.
Commissioner Marks said this is not a political statement because those
who do not live in Emerald Isle cannot vote in Emerald Isle.
Commissioner McElraft commented as follows.
The 2-cents that was voted in by the past board and by the present board
for storm water was not a 14 year 2-cent but a 2-cent to get the storm water
project going. The $185,000 for
EMS, the cost of living for employees can be kept in.
Each department head has pared down their budget as much as they can.
She is not saying cut vital services any more.
She is not saying cut anywhere else.
All she is saying is stretch the storm water project out, with an
increase cost of $18,000 over a 4-year period for interest.
There will be $600,000 more in the budget starting next year than in this
18.5 cent budget. Capital Outlay
for Police vehicles and a Fire Truck has been delayed to be purchased in 4
years. This would more than pay for
those things, but it is just like Mr. Wootten said, the budget for the next
5-years projection is increased, increased, increased.
The budget this year started out with a possible increase in taxes of 4
to 5-cent and we are down to where we are now.
Commissioner McElraft said there
is no reason why the town cannot take a payment and pay it slowly until the
money is in citizen’s pockets instead of taking money from citizens when they
are already hurting. A 1-cent
property tax increase is being talked about.
A 3-cent and 48-cent is also being talked about.
She would like to see the town stretch the storm water project payments
out.
Commissioner
McElraft continued that the Mayor was very interested in the General Fund being
built up. $240,000 was taken out of
the General Fund without any input from the public by the previous board.
The General Fund was depleted $240,000 to start the storm water project.
She thinks that needs to be put back in.
The storm water part of the project would not be hurt by delaying
payments. Commissioner McElraft
thinks this should be considered and not go with a tax increase.
She said, “I will not vote for a tax increase on the people.”
Commissioner Eckhardt said he supported setting the tax rate at
18.5cents. He is talking city tax
only. He is not talking nourishment
and solid waste fees. Four public
budget workshops were held, approximately 10 to 12 hours, a Public Hearing was
held on June 11 and based on that the Town Manager and staff held the line on
expenditures. They did better than
hold the line, they reduced the expenses. Last
year it was $5.4 million. This year
it is $5.2 million. The reasons why
there needs to be an increase is (1) the State is in trouble with their budget
and they are passing it along to towns and (2) it doesn’t seem wise to dig
further into the town’s reserve.
(3) As Commissioner Eckhardt looked at the 5-year forecast the
Town Manager prepared, he does not see any windfall that he has heard today.
He sees a flat challenge for the next 5 years for this board and any
boards in the future. As a fixed incomer, he counts on a flat playing field as far
as finances are concerned and that is what he wants. He said he will support the 18.5 cent.
Commissioner Farmer asked about the spread out that was presented. She
did not have her copy and could not remember about it.
Mr. Rush said it if were spread out over 4-years a 17.5 tax rate could be
maintained this year and come close to that next year.
In the 3rd year, a 20 to 25 cent rate is being looked at if
the storm water project is kept on the same schedule as now in accordance with
the agreement with the Clean Water Trust Fund.
In the 4th year because of the declining debt service
payments, it would push the tax rate back down to around 19 or 19.5.
That spike that one year is because of overlapping payments on the land
and the infrastructure. As it is
set up now, the land will be paid off in two years and then will start paying on
the infrastructure for a period of 10 years, roughly $270,00 a year for a period
of 12 years. This would amount to
2-cent on the tax rate.
Commissioner Farmer asked for clarification that you would have 2-cent
tax rate increase in three years and also be paying $18,000 interest more.
Town
Manager Rush said is would be closer to 3-cent and it would be temporary.
Mr. Rush said he thinks the estimates have been close to $18,000 or
$19,000, it may be a little bit more, it may be a little less, depending on the
rates and other factors.
Commissioner Farmer did not feel
that was fiscally very responsible to be paying like this when we are not in a
position where we have to do that. She
also noted this budget is “bare boned”.
Capital Outlay has been put off until next year or the year after.
The projected tax rate shows that would more than eat up the additional
funding from sales tax from beach renourishment.
Commissioner Farmer supported the 18.5 cent tax rate.
Commissioner Messer commended the Town Manager and Department Heads who
have done a very good job. Commissioner
Messer said he does not support a tax increase because there is a way to get
this job done without it.
Commissioner McElraft commented there is a windfall but over the next 5
years the town is planning on spending it with the 5-year projection. The windfall is over $ 400,000 to $ 500,000 from the beach
nourishment and the $200,000 from Sales Tax.
Those are windfalls. Commissioner
McElraft feels the town needs to stretch the storm water payment out and “bare
bone” the budget for the next 5-years. When
talking about fiscal responsibility, she thinks the town needs to be fiscally
responsible to the taxpayer because it is getting ready to go into his pockets.
She suggested digging down in the towns pockets and undo what was done
and put $240,000 back into the General Fund and let the storm water project be
paid out over 4 years rather than 2.
Commissioner Farmer reiterated you might get by without a tax increase
this year but there is already a guarantee of a 3-cent tax increase in 3 years.
Commissioner McElraft said there was no guarantee for 3-cent tax unless
you continue to spend. The $600,000
windfall will more than pay for a Fire truck and Police cars in that 3-cents if
the town continues to be fiscally responsible and not spend $18,000 on law suits
that we should not have had in the first place.
Mr. Rush commented on the comment made about the attitude of the Manager
and Staff in preparing the budget, he pointed out that the budget for the fiscal
year 01 was right at $5,391,960. Bottom
line on the new budget, based on 18.5-cent is $5,212,825. That is roughly $178,000 less in expenditures.
Mr. Rush commended the staff for doing a fantastic job of keeping
expenditures down and keeping their budget requests down.
This is the leanest budget he has seen in his career in local government.
There is virtually no Capital Outlay.
There are decreases in departmental spending. There is minimal salary increases on an average of 2.5%.
He feels the staff has made a grand effort to keep expenses down.
Mr. Rush said as far the projections over the next 5-years, those
projections factor in what revenues can be anticipated.
The key functions of the expenditure sides of those projections, a 3%
increase in departmental budgets, and on the Capital Outlay side, it will
basically return to a normal level as far as 01-02 and the number of Police Cars
replaced, the number of heavy equipment replaced, etc.
This is just a projection at this point in time and Mr. Rush felt it was
his responsibility to give the board some idea of what the operations will cost
in future years for planning. It is
not a crystal ball. Expenditures
may go up, expenditures may have to be reduced, etc. and those are decisions
this board and future boards will have to make.
Mr. Rush felt the projections give a reasonable estimate of what
government is likely to cost in future years based on past practices and based
on what we know about revenue sources at this time.
Commissioner
Eckhardt made a motion to adopt the Budget Ordinance that reflects an 18.5 cent
tax rate for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. The
board voted with a split vote, 3 to 2. Voting
in favor of the motion was Commissioners Farmer, Marks and Eckhardt.
Voting against the motion was Commissioners Messer and McElraft.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Eckhardt made a motion to adjourn and the board voted
unanimously with a vote of 5-0. Motion
carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn K. Custy
Certified Municipal Clerk
|